Iranian Speaker Warns U.S. of Retaliation Over Energy Assets

TEHRAN — Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf issued a stark warning to the United States on Monday, stating that any attacks on Iran's oil and gas infrastructure would trigger immediate retaliation against American energy interests. The declaration marks a significant escalation in rhetoric surrounding the Strait of Hormuz, a critical global shipping chokepoint where tensions have intensified following recent comments from Washington.

Qalibaf made the statement during a parliamentary session, directly addressing threats reportedly made by U.S. War Secretary Pete Hegseth regarding Iran's oil tanker fleet. Hegseth had previously indicated that American forces were prepared to target Iranian maritime assets in response to alleged destabilizing activities in the region. Qalibaf characterized these moves as an act of aggression that would not go unanswered, asserting that Tehran possesses the capability to strike U.S. energy facilities globally.

"Any attack on our oil and gas assets will be met with a severe response against American energy interests," Qalibaf said, emphasizing that Iran views its energy infrastructure as a sovereign right protected by all necessary means. The Speaker did not specify the nature of the potential retaliation but noted that the Iranian military and intelligence apparatus are on high alert. He warned that the consequences would extend beyond the immediate theater of operations, potentially disrupting global energy markets.

The exchange comes amid a broader standoff over control of the Strait of Hormuz, through which approximately one-fifth of the world's consumed petroleum passes. Both nations have increased naval deployments in the Persian Gulf in recent weeks, raising fears of an accidental or intentional clash between U.S. and Iranian vessels. While Washington has maintained that its actions are defensive measures to ensure freedom of navigation, Tehran has framed the presence of American warships as a violation of its territorial waters.

Diplomatic channels remain open but strained as both sides assess the risks of direct military confrontation. U.S. officials have not yet issued a formal response to Qalibaf's specific threat, though Pentagon spokespeople reiterated their commitment to protecting international shipping lanes and American personnel. The situation remains fluid, with analysts noting that miscalculations in the high-stakes environment could rapidly spiral into a wider regional conflict.

As of Monday afternoon, no military strikes have been reported, but oil prices fluctuated on global markets following the exchange of threats. The international community is watching closely for further developments, particularly regarding whether either side will de-escalate or proceed with the threatened actions. Questions remain regarding the specific targets Qalibaf alluded to and the timeline for any potential Iranian response if U.S. forces act against the tanker fleet.